You've mapped the LV during sustained, re-entrant VT. After mapping, there's a spot where red meets purple or "early meets late". Someone says "that's got to be the isthmus".
Is that the isthmus, or just how the window of interest was set?
(Click to zoom on image)
Not necessarily. Red meeting purple marks the earliest & latest electrograms inside the window of interest you set, relative to your reference. Even a correct WOI might not show the isthmus as early meets late.
Before looking for red, look at the colour bar. On a re-entrant map it’s the first thing that tells you whether a circuit can even be on the screen.
The colour bar shows how much cycle length you’ve collected so far. On this particular company’s system the colour bar is a circle, but the numbers mean the same thing.
In the example above:
483ms more or less matches 485ms…(we don’t get too pedantic in VT mapping, because much of the VT circuit is often hidden intramurally). Near enough is good enough. So now we know its plausible the entire re-entrant circuit is displayed on the map somewhere, & now it’s time to go and look for it.
If that number was only 240ms, you haven’t collected much of the TCL. You might have part of the circuit, and if you’re lucky you might have the isthmus, but you haven’t mapped one full rotation…so you should keep mapping.
If you’ve mapped the whole LV and still only have 240ms, this VT may be in the right ventricle. Or part of the circuit may be intramural or epicardial, and you’ve only mapped the LV endocardium. VT circuits are often very 3D, which is why you often don’t get the full TCL on an endocardial map.
Colour bars matter a lot for activation maps of re-entrant arrhythmias. They’re not that important for focal ones.
A figure-of-eight VT showing every colour of the rainbow (tilt your head 90 degrees and it’s an eight) is the gold standard. Even after years & years of mapping VT, a complete ventricular activation map is very difficult to get.
The WOI is simply the electrograms you want to include on your map. Any EGM inside it gets a timing relative to your reference, and that timing is assigned a colour onto the map.
The reference should be in the same chamber, or at least the same half of the heart, as the one you’re mapping. For VT that’s a ventricular EGM or the QRS. Above all, it has to be consistent beat to beat. Probably nine times out of ten or more I’ll choose a QRS complex. Avoid a lead with two peaks of similar amplitude (V1 can do this), because the system can flick between them creating mapping instability. Minimum amplitude on a single S wave can be cleaner.
One rotation of the circuit takes one TCL. In our example that’s 485ms to go through the isthmus, out the exit, around the outer loop, into the entrance and back into the isthmus. So most of the time I want the window to include the full TCL.
In every one of those, the window is the same size. You’ve only moved it relative to the reference.
For an experienced mapper, it doesn’t matter how you set the window. The information will be there on your map. The colours will be different, but the colours don’t matter for a re-entrant circuit. I’ll say it again…the colours don’t matter for a re-entrant circuit.
Take the -240/+240 window, with the reference in the middle of the QRS. Then walk the catheter around the circuit. This is more easily explained with the diagram below. Walking the catheter across the whole circuit will look like this:
That’s why re-entrant maps have red & purple next to each other. For all intents & purposes, that last purple EGM & the first red EGM are nearly the same timing. The window exaggerates the difference by calling one last & the other first.
Because the isthmus conducts slowly, EGMs of that timing are clustered in a small area. So red is often a much smaller patch than yellow. Follow the colours of the rainbow & you have the circuit, because -240 + 240 = 480ms. That’s the full TCL, give or take about 5ms.
The only gold-standard way to confirm this is the re-entrant circuit is to entrain from here & confirm the post-pacing interval is zero milliseconds with entrainment. In reality, often what we do is just ablate here & see if it terminates.
This is why colours don’t matter.
Same circuit, same reference, but now the window is -10ms/+470ms. Still 480ms. Still a legitimate window. All we’ve done is slide it.
The mid-diastolic isthmus potential that was red (earliest) in the first window is now in the middle of this window. So it lines up with green.
The system always tries to use the full spectrum of colours. It stretches red to purple across the earliest & latest points you’ve collected so far (the same “so far” problem as focal mapping).
Build the -10/+470 map point by point:
Part way through a map, suddenly all the colours change at once & someone asks “What happened to the map?” The system has found a new earliest point & recalibrated everything against it.
The finished -10/+470 map looks very different from the first one.
You’d still read the circuit the same way: red, orange, yellow, green, light blue, dark blue, purple. You’ve found the same VT circuit as before. The colours are just in different spots.
So the job is:
The colour isn’t that important. EGMs are always important.
The same principles apply to atrial flutter.
If you’re not mapping during VT, it’s generally called a substrate map, & often voltage is collected too. A timing map in sinus or during pacing can show isochronal crowding, which correlates with VT isthmus sites but doesn’t actually identify the isthmus. Mapping during VT is different: you treat it like flutter & you’re identifying the isthmus.
Thanks for tuning in :)
Cheers
Mitch & CPiP Team
Interpreting re-entrant VT activation maps is taught in more depth in the Mapping in 3D program of EP in Practice. https://cardiacphysinpractice.com/ep-in-practice/
Get the latest updates and event details, and be notified when new courses launch.